From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-17 08:53:46 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: andreatta@mail.chem.sc.edu (Dan Andreatta)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada paper critic
Date: 17 Jun 2002 08:53:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <338040f8.0206170753.27702044@posting.google.com>
References: <aebegp$5cpo1$1@ID-100557.news.dfncis.de>
 <aebgq8$5goi4$1@ID-100557.news.dfncis.de>
 <dale-837123.11434614062002@its-aw-news.its.rmit.edu.au>
 <3D0976BD.21FA7516@sympatico.ca> <aecmq7$j2o$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <3D0A1A15.C600F684@sympatico.ca> <aed9b4$rg9$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <3D0A3D89.50E5A3CA@despammed.com> <aedgsh$boq$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <3d0aae5b_1@news.bluewin.ch> <uy9dg27o0.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.151.109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1024329226 17145 127.0.0.1 (17 Jun 2002 15:53:46
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Jun 2002 15:53:46 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26161
Date: 2002-06-17T15:53:46+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:<uy9dg27o0.fsf@wanadoo.fr>...
> BTW, it would be nice to have updated values here as GCC 3.1 does have a
> quite better optimizer. Anyone have checked speed of MSVC compiler vs GCC 3.1 ?
> 

In this site there is a comparison between Intel/C++ and GCC/C++ 3.1.

http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html

Dan