From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 13:34:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: andreatta@mail.chem.sc.edu (Dan Andreatta) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: status of Ada STL? Date: 14 Jun 2002 13:34:45 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <338040f8.0206141234.5bb032ed@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.151.109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1024086885 6760 127.0.0.1 (14 Jun 2002 20:34:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2002 20:34:45 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25979 Date: 2002-06-14T20:34:45+00:00 List-Id: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) wrote in message news:... > I am trying to determine the status of the Ada version of the C++ > Standard Template Library. I see that this has been discussed in the > past on comp.lang.ada, but I don't see much on it in the past year or > so. Is it still in the works somewhere? How far along is it compared > to the C++ STL? And does Ada have any fundamental limitations that > preclude the full functionality of the C++ version? Thanks. There is a SGL library around (Standard Generic Library ??), but doesn't seem to be actively developed. Here is a link: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~akonstan/presentations/SGL/ Dan