From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1df6bc3799debed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" Subject: Re: Language Design Mistakes (was "not intended...") Date: 1997/05/15 Message-ID: <337B178E.744C@this.message>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241735442 Sender: usenet@most.fw.hac.com (News Administration) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sparc01 References: <19970514122600.IAA28826@ladder02.news.aol.com> Organization: Hughes Defense Communications Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > John Herro says > < standard! (It was, of course, removed in Ada 83).>> > > It is indeed surprising given that there was no such thing as "the > 1980 Ada standard". The first standard for Ada was in April of 1993. > .... Before we start a semantic war about the definition of "standard" let me point out that I have a copy of MIL-STD-1815A (1983) where the STD (rightly or wrongly) means "standard" In fact, before I read the quote above, I was planning to post the following query (for unrelated reasons): Anyone know of an online source for MIL-STD-1815, or whether (and where) the "assert" statement can be found in a (semi-)official pre-1983 Ada publication (online OR printed)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wes Groleau, Hughes Defense Communications, Fort Wayne, IN USA Senior Software Engineer - AFATDS Tool-smith Wanna-be w w g r o l at p s e u l t 0 1 dot f w dot h a c dot c o m SPAM should be sent to I.want.one@mailbombs.for.idiots.org If you don't want to pay $500 (see 47 USC 227), don't send it here. ----------------------------------------------------------------------