From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1df6bc3799debed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Jeff Carter Subject: Re: Language Design Mistakes (was "not intended...") Date: 1997/05/15 Message-ID: <337B0DDA.41C67EA6@spam.innocon.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241682530 References: <19970515114101.HAA03299@ladder02.news.aol.com> Organization: Innovative Concepts, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John Herro wrote: > > I wrote: > >> It might be surprising, but that was allowed in the 1980 Ada > >> standard! (It was, of course, removed in Ada 83). > Robert Dewar wrote: > > ... there was no such thing as "the 1980 Ada standard"... > > There were ... preliminary drafts ... and it is perhaps to > > one of these that John refers. > > I was referring to ANSI/MIL-STD-1815, without the "A." > > - John Herro > Software Innovations Technology > http://members.aol.com/AdaTutor > ftp://members.aol.com/AdaTutor I think that was only MIL-STD-1815, dated 1980 Dec, not an ANSI standard. -- Jeff Carter PGP:1024/440FBE21 Auntie-spam reply to; try ( carter @ innocon . com ) "Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time." Monty Python & the Holy Grail