From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2078dddcdcd8d83 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion :-) [was: assign help!!] Date: 1997/05/12 Message-ID: <337788B6.193D@this.message>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241163383 Sender: usenet@most.fw.hac.com (News Administration) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sparc02 References: <5kjvcv$evt@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw> <5kn8ko$jcc@top.mitre.org> <1997May7.201035.2439@nosc.mil> <33727EEA.2092@sprintmail.com> Organization: Hughes Defense Communications Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > .... distinction between "general" > and "specific" nouns is quite ambiguous and subjective, depending on True, when you have a spectrum from general to specific, people will disagree on where the middle is. That does not invalidate the guideline. "Fido" is more specific than "Dog" which is more specific than "Quadruped". But I wouldn't accuse you of violating the guideline if you said Fido : Dog; instead of Dog : Quadruped; > context and point of view. It may take a lot of effort and hours spent > poring over Roget's Thesaurus hunting for synonyms, and then more I can not remember ever in ten years of Ada work having to spend hours poring over a thesaurus! (But congratulations for knowing the difference between "poring" and "pouring") > agonized hours deciding which synonym is more "general" .... Nor have I ever done this. See Quadruped .. Fido above > "specific". And for what? A percentage of your readers would've made > the opposite decision you made, so where does that leave readability? The fact that I would have chosen Fido : Dog; does NOT mean I would have trouble comprehending Dog : Quadruped; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wes Groleau, Hughes Defense Communications, Fort Wayne, IN USA Senior Software Engineer - AFATDS Tool-smith Wanna-be w w g r o l at p s e u l t 0 1 dot f w dot h a c dot c o m SPAM should be sent to I.want.one@mailbombs.for.idiots.org If you don't want to pay $500 (see 47 USC 227), don't send it here. ----------------------------------------------------------------------