From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2078dddcdcd8d83 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion :-) [was: assign help!!] Date: 1997/05/12 Message-ID: <337774D0.12A6@this.message>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241333416 Sender: usenet@most.fw.hac.com (News Administration) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sparc02 References: <5kjvcv$evt@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw> <5kn8ko$jcc@top.mitre.org> <1997May7.201035.2439@nosc.mil> <33727EEA.2092@sprintmail.com> <5kuf1j$17vi@uni.library.ucla.edu> <3373666A.31DFF4F5@spam.innocon.com> <3374E402.77A@sprintmail.com> Organization: Hughes Defense Communications Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > .... So you wind up with abominations like: > > T : Target; > > The usual argument is: "Hey, c'mon, it's not so bad, you and I both > know that T is a target. It's just like what they did in the RM, so > it must be cool. Look at the standard packages, man. How come they > just use "E" for an exception identity? ...." This (and a recent post about AQ&S not following its own guidelines) illustrates a principle of documentation: People follow examples, not guidelines. In other words, "Do as I say, not as I do" almost never works! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wes Groleau, Hughes Defense Communications, Fort Wayne, IN USA Senior Software Engineer - AFATDS Tool-smith Wanna-be w w g r o l at p s e u l t 0 1 dot f w dot h a c dot c o m SPAM should be sent to I.want.one@mailbombs.for.idiots.org If you don't want to pay $500 (see 47 USC 227), don't send it here. ----------------------------------------------------------------------