From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2925b133078d1557 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "John G. Volan" Subject: Re: Flexible Strings (was Equality operator...) Date: 1997/05/10 Message-ID: <3374220A.74D0@sprintmail.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 240475638 References: <9704301422.AA07755@most> <3F2AA8DEC61418AE.502E81A8ECA1C4E7.3A25DE2FB38755A4@library-proxy.airnews.net> Organization: Sprint Internet Passport Reply-To: johnvolan@sprintmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Erik Magnuson wrote: > Robert, your claim is a little broad here. I have used 2 different Ada 83 > compilers runtimes for embedded targets that did NOT implement any storage > reclamation for Unchecked_Conversion, i.e., UC simply set the pointer to ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^ Unchecked_Deallocation UD Well, we knew what you meant to say. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Internet.Usenet.Put_Signature (Name => "John G. Volan", Home_Email => "johnvolan@sprintmail.com", Slogan => "Ada95: The World's *FIRST* International-Standard OOPL", Disclaimer => "These opinions were never defined, so using them " & "would be erroneous...or is that just nondeterministic now? :-) "); ------------------------------------------------------------------------