From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2078dddcdcd8d83 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "John G. Volan" Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion :-) [was: assign help!!] Date: 1997/05/09 Message-ID: <33733AEA.61D7@sprintmail.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 240528827 References: <5kjvcv$evt@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw> <5kn8ko$jcc@top.mitre.org> <1997May7.201035.2439@nosc.mil> <33727EEA.2092@sprintmail.com> <5kuf1j$17vi@uni.library.ucla.edu> Organization: Sprint Internet Passport Reply-To: johnvolan@sprintmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jay Martin wrote: > In fact wouldn't be cool if Ada forced all types to have "_Type" suffixes. I take it this was suggested tongue-in-cheek, but actually it wouldn't be so hard to get a compiler to do that, if you really wanted to. GNAT for instance already includes the capability to do some style checking. Take a look at the -gnatr and -gnatg switches. > Heh probably make those C hackers blood boil. What do you mean? Would they be jealous that we could enforce a nice readable style when they couldn't, or would they incensed that we'd _dare_ to enforce a nice readable style when they _know_ the whole point behind computers is to be as creatively cryptic and as anarchically obfuscated as possible so as to overthrow any vestige of authority and establish themselves as a guru priesthood (bow three times toward Redmond) selling row after row of slick ten-pound glossy-covered how-to books to the masses of glazed-eyed zombie Internet lemmings? :-) :-) :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Internet.Usenet.Put_Signature (Name => "John G. Volan", Home_Email => "johnvolan@sprintmail.com", Slogan => "Ada95: The World's *FIRST* International-Standard OOPL", Disclaimer => "These opinions were never defined, so using them " & "would be erroneous...or is that just nondeterministic now? :-) "); ------------------------------------------------------------------------