From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,baa6871d466e5af9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats Weber <Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch>
Subject: Re: AQ&S Guidance on pragma Elaborate_Body
Date: 1997/04/28
Message-ID: <33649817.3184@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 238021134
References: <528878564wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk> <dewar.861642821@merv>
 <E940xu.62B@world.std.com> <dewar.861854112@merv> <E95IKB.4Gx@world.std.com>
 <dewar.861936524@merv> <336089AF.6046@elca-matrix.ch> <dewar.862141100@merv>
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:

> We cannot have a statement in the standard that says "Elaboration shall be
> automatically handled sufficiently well so that Mats Weber's programs run
> without Program_Error", what we need is a very precise charaterization of
> the set of programs that are to be considered legal.
> 
> Mats, what is this subset that you propose? in detail?

It's at
<http://lglwww.epfl.ch/Team/MW/Ada-Extensions/Ada-Extensions.html>,
sections 2.7 and 4.5 (scroll down a little for the table of contents).