From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c8bbb1419c8e81a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <GarlingtonKE@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Waiver question
Date: 1997/04/22
Message-ID: <335D0F57.5455@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 236721059
References: <33585385.C8D@lmtas.lmco.com> <dewar.861594356@merv>
 <335BB40D.4FD2@lmtas.lmco.com>
Organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ken Garlington wrote:
> 
> For the TI DSP family, I know of only one Ada 83 vendor (TI/Tartan) and
> no
> Ada 95 vendors. The AdaIC databases confirm my understanding. There
> appears
> to be more than one C/C++ vendor (TI is one) for this family, however.
> The
> request does not cite a specific number.

I've just been told that for the TI C40 DSP, the following languages are
available:

Ada 83 - TI (Tartan) appears to be the only vendor.
C++    - TI (Tartan) appears to be the only vendor. However, TI (Tartan)
         has announced that they are discontinuing support for this
product.
C      - TI appears to be the only vendor.

Based on this, I would say that the growth in the C++ market for this
target is
not as large as the vendor believes. If anyone has different
information, let
me know.

--
LMTAS - The Fighter Enterprise - "Our Brand Means Quality"
For job listings, other info: http://www.lmtas.com or
http://www.lmco.com