From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,26f0ce9469ee1122
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Eric B. Lemings" <zebl1@etsu-tn.edu>
Subject: Re: Where are the Ada 95 repositories?
Date: 1997/04/18
Message-ID: <335812F3.43998D4F@etsu-tn.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 235829557
References: <3356534D.E65C2DDE@etsu-tn.edu>
 <EACHUS.97Apr18190325@spectre.mitre.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Organization: East Tennessee State University
Reply-To: zebl1@etsu-tn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert I. Eachus wrote:

> In article <3356534D.E65C2DDE@etsu-tn.edu> "Eric B. Lemings"
> <zebl1@etsu-tn.edu> writes:
>
>   > A lot of the general packages are now part of the standard Ada
> 95
>   > library. That's not what I call reusable.
>
>   Gee!  That would seem to me to be the ultimate in re-use.  The
> packages were found to be so ubiquitous that they are now in the
> standard.

Quite right.  The last comment was targeted at the older, domain-
specific repositories.  My sentences somehow got out of order.

Eric.