From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10261c,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: paul@the-hug.demon.co.ukx (Paul Oldham) Subject: Re: Best way to kill Microsoft (Re: M$ to STRIKE again...) Date: 1997/04/21 Message-ID: <3357aaba.105573429@news.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 236295471 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: the-hug.demon.co.uk References: <33489A15.453C@ix.netcom.com> <01bc433c$e5109820$230228ce@default> <5j6egs$aof@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> <33570AB4.74055D18@uniserve.com> <5j7gpj$4nc$1@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de> <33579F6F.CAC@student.csi.cuny.edu> Organization: The Hug Reply-To: poldham@cix.compulink.co.ukx Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.pascal.misc Date: 1997-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 18 Apr 1997 09:21:03 -0700, M A <34110s96@student.csi.cuny.edu> growled: >Will L Unix (X Windows) ever become the main stream like Windows. If >this god damn thing is free how come nobody supports it. Lots of people support it. You can even buy commercial support. However if you mean no Cobol compilers then I guess it's that they're different markets. Linux's big "markets" are home users and in businesses network services: servers, especially web servers, firewalls and the like. -- Paul Oldham, Milton, Cambridge, UK http://www.the-hug.demon.co.uk/paul/ To email me take the "x" off the *reply-to* address