From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Byron <Byron.B.Kauffman@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada?
Date: 1997/04/16
Message-ID: <3354C4D5.22ED@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 235192520
References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <5itlph$1k9@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>
 <5iui29$iei@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <5ivtcu$puv@huron.eel.ufl.edu>
 <5j1ann$f20@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>
Organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> 
snip..
> 
> Say, didn't you just troll with this bit of nonsense, referring to the
> IBM PC:
> 
> ->   Perhaps you knew of a better micro-processor for systems that could
> ->   fit on the average desktop? It just so happens that the 8086 was
> ->   state of the art back then.
> 
> Can you say, MC68000?

I believe you've got one too many zeros - it was the MC6800.

-- 
Byron