From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dce310950e50860c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: **stuffle@pcii.net (Kenneth W. Sodemann) Subject: Looking for comments on ObjectAda and books. Date: 1997/04/12 Message-ID: <334f01eb.95806760@news.mwci.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 234240534 Organization: MidWest Communications, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-04-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Folks; I am looking for comments on ObjectAda, and also suggestions on books. For a little background: I have done professional development in Ada83 using Rational Apex (embedded avionics systems), and Borland C++ (Windows based satalite communications systems), and have done "hobbiest" type work using Watcom C++ (OS/2 & Windows), gcc (Linux), and Turbo Pascal (DOS). I am looking at ObjectAda as something I can mess around with at home to bring me up to speed in Ada95. Also, my ideal system would have a nice IDE, and good windows support. So, with this in mind, I am looking for experianced opinions on ObjectAda. I am also looking for input on good Ada95 books. >From the information on Anonix's web site, and from talking to their sales people, it sounds like the way I would like to go. However, one item from the RR Software web site kind of bugs me (quoted below): "ObjectAda: We have tested the demo with the 7.0 version of ObjectAda Professional Edition. This appears to be the most recent version available. ObjectAda still has significant problems with overriding inherited subprograms. Therefore, we haven't provided a version for ObjectAda. Aonix does not seem interested in fixing our bug reports." So, if anyone has any suggestions or comments, I would love to hear them. Thanks; -- Ken Sodemann stuffle@pcii.net http://users.mwci.net/~stuffle When replying, remove the "**" from the start of the e-mail address