From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10261c,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public X-Google-Thread: f907c,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gidf907c,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 145623,d4aba2022b03306e X-Google-Attributes: gid145623,public From: essoft@ix.netcom.com Subject: Re: M$ to STRIKE again... Date: 1997/04/07 Message-ID: <334992BB.66C6@ix.netcom.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 231419595 References: <33489A15.453C@ix.netcom.com> <3348FC2E.A8B@csolve.net> Organization: Netcom X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Apr 07 5:40:22 PM PDT 1997 Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.pascal.misc,comp.lang.prolog,comp.lang.basc.visual.misc,de.comp.lang.c Date: 1997-04-07T17:40:22-07:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > > The discussion of MS strategy and Win 95 is completely irrelevant > to the majority (operhaps ALL) of these groups. Really!? Don't they use Win3.x based sw that could be affected by this move?