From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: "Howard W. LUDWIG" <Howard_W_Ludwig@ccmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Ada95 to ANSI_C converter
Date: 1997/04/04
Message-ID: <33451AE4.441A@ccmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 230684530
References: <5hbrah$ctt$1@gail.ripco.com>
Organization: Lockheed Martin Electronics & Missiles
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c
Date: 1997-04-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


David Emery wrote:
> 
> >This raises a few immediate questions. Do you mean ANSI C, or do you mean
> >ANSI C++ (as it evolves)?
> 
> Note that C++ is entering ballot as both an ANSI and ISO standard.
> That means we should finally have a C++ standard by the end of the year,
> 2 1/2 years after the Ada95 standard!
> 
>                         dave

C++ is presently going through balloting of the Committee Draft #2 and last
month finished the public comment period on the draft.  The various comments
(public and ballot) will need to be addressed.  Then the Draft International
Standard will be submitted for balloting (presently anticipated January 1998).
The publication of the ISO standard is not expected until around August 1998,
about 3 1/2 years after the Ada 95 standard, so Dave was overly optimistic
for C++ by about a year.

Howard W. LUDWIG, Ph.D.
Working, but not speaking, for Lockheed Martin Electronics & Missiles Co.