From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d69420c8e0f39b97
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard Toy <rtoy@dra.hmg.gb>
Subject: Re: Tasking newbee
Date: 1997/04/01
Message-ID: <33413C88.792C@dra.hmg.gb>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 230064115
References: <33412898.2A8C@INnet.be>
To: spochic@INnet.be
Organization: Eurocontrol EFMS Integration Team
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Sebastien Pochic wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
>  could someone explain what I should do so that the small tasks (without
> the loop) will end before the "big" task (with the loop), in my example
> it first counts the loop before even beginning the other tasks..
> here's my example:
> 

SNIP

Read the LRM more carefully ;-) especially 9.5.2

The behaviour you are experiencing is correct.

-- 

Regards

Richard Toy

Work: rtoy@dra.hmg.gb
Home: richtoy@pluto.win-uk.net