From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,34358678b5b237bc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Tom Moran Subject: Re: GNAT & WIN32 Programming. Date: 1997/03/15 Message-ID: <332B27FD.92A@bix.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 225824834 References: <3327E51E.7F98@netspace.net.au> <01bc304c$4399c550$262a6282@cln49ae> <332A485F.78D6@bix.com> Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333 Reply-To: tmoran@bix.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar has pointed out that a typo makes the follow completely incomprehensible. Please change "withing" to "within". > > > 2. The web page talked about that no C compiler > > > product was required (they thought) with GNAT. > > > Is this true? > > > > > > > Yes. > Is the function of RC also handled withing GNAT? I don't see it. Should be Is the function of RC also handled within GNAT? I don't see it.