From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c9aaf040659caf8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Steven D.Litvintchouk" Subject: Re: (unverified) Ada mandate cancelled (Greg A would be proud) Date: 1997/03/13 Message-ID: <332843AD.3910@mitre.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 225243118 References: <3.0.32.19970307192557.009979a0@iu.net> To: emery@grebyn.com Organization: The MITRE Corporation Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: David Emery wrote: > (One of the most common reasons I've heard is "Why, if > Ada is so good, doesn't Microsoft use it." When you ask if the SPO/PM > is willing to wait for Version 3.1 of SDI to get it to work right, you > get no answer...) SDI version 3.1 would simply be the old Safeguard ABM with a more modern GUI. To really get SDI to really work right, you might need to wait for SDI/NT. :-) -- Steven D. Litvintchouk "There seems to be no mainframe Email: sdl@mitre.org explanation for the PC world Disclaimer: As far as I am aware, in which we're living." the opinions expressed herein -- President Bill Clinton are not those of my employer.