From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.129.70.135 with SMTP id t129mr15751788ywa.39.1460395615773;
        Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.13.19 with SMTP id 19mr23325oti.12.1460395615666; Mon,
 11 Apr 2016 10:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!7no1700308qgj.0!news-out.google.com!u9ni94igk.0!nntp.google.com!nt3no11134790igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d69ef793-c556-495a-a2e8-c6bc8dee88f0@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=149.32.224.36;
 posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.32.224.36
References: <56ff6352-590e-4de7-a361-bc2fec0538fb@googlegroups.com>
 <bcaa90eb-61ec-4ebd-868b-9ef4b2285e23@googlegroups.com>
 <ne5k2d$omh$1@dont-email.me>
 <2db8b996-1c47-4789-97a8-075588598368@googlegroups.com>
 <40997fc7-d8fc-4d78-86aa-23b951ef436c@googlegroups.com>
 <d69ef793-c556-495a-a2e8-c6bc8dee88f0@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3327ab2c-3514-44d9-beba-2300facab204@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How to do multiple instances of a generic packages in automated
 way. (using ravenscar profile)
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:26:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30077
Date: 2016-04-11T10:26:55-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 10:21:17 AM UTC-7, Daniel Norber wrote:
> > Indeed, discriminant is allowed in the protected specification only. Since you put it in the protected body, you violated the syntax rule.
> > 
> > Anh Vo
> Thanks, i tried without using it in body.
> 
> but i think this approach fails to fullfill Ravenscar profile.
> 
> Compiler says:
> warning: creation of protected object of type "buffer" with non-static discriminants  will violate restriction "No_Implicit_Heap_Allocation"

Do your requirements really need access protected type implementation? If not, regular protected type does just fine.