From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3c42d4793dc714ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ed Bruce Subject: Re: Pro*Ada and Gnat Date: 1997/03/11 Message-ID: <33259C8D.167E@ha.hac.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 224718746 References: <5f9hlt$7j9@hetre.wanadoo.fr> <5fhnnh$ndl@hetre.wanadoo.fr> To: Rosen.Adalog@wanadoo.fr Organization: Hughes Aircraft Company Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: J-P. Rosen wrote: > > Thanks to all those who responded, it seems we got the simplest > approach (use Pro*C). > > And I think my client will write a note to Oracle corp. to tell them > what he thinks about their product... I can tell you right now that Oracle doesn't care. They have already announced that they will no longer support their Pro*Ada product past it's 1.8 release. They are moving all support into their Ada Module product. This product is currently worse then Pro*Ada as it doesn't support aggregate data types. -- Ed Bruce