From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a4ac379de0af89d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats Weber <Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch>
Subject: Re: ACT announces first 100% validations of Ada 95 compilers
Date: 1997/03/10
Message-ID: <332412BB.665C@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 224501555
References: <dewar.857653821@merv> <331FDDB7.7520@bix.com>
 <5frl9d$19d$1@news.nyu.edu>
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Richard Kenner wrote:
> 
> In article <331FDDB7.7520@bix.com> tmoran@bix.com writes:
> >What compiler switch settings were used for the validation?
> 
> -O0 -gnato -gnatv -gnatws -gnatd7
> 
> This turns off optimization, [...]

Did optimisation cause problems for the validation ? I'm asking this
because we have had many optimisation related problems with non-GNAT
compilers, to the point that we cannot deliver any code compiled with
optimisation.