From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc65fe38e6751a89
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Dave Wood <dpw@aonix.com>
Subject: Re: Aeonix Ada 95
Date: 1997/03/09
Message-ID: <33239BEA.21C9@aonix.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 224321350
References: <857938743.26136@dejanews.com> <dewar.857944378@merv>
 <33237061.6A5D@bix.com>
Organization: Aonix
Reply-To: dpw@aonix.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Tom Moran wrote:
> 
> >> embedded system with some tough timimg constraints
> > GNAT ... only general purpose compiler that passes ALL (100%)
> > of the applicable tests in the real time annex
>   Do all versions of GNAT do all the real time stuff in an embedded
> system context?  The original poster did not specify his target system.

I can't respond to the original poster due to conflict
of interest, but we have validated the real-time annex
just recently for our first ObjectAda Real-Time compiler
(for Intel targets).  PowerPC is following shortly.  I'm
pretty sure others have validated the real-time annex for
real-time targets (Green Hills?)

GNAT is not validated for *any* real-time targets, is it?

-- Dave Wood
-- Product Manager, ObjectAda for Windows
-- Aonix - "Ada with an Attitude"
-- http://www.aonix.com