From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e70c13232dc4a26
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Shochat <shochat@itg-sepg.logicon.com>
Subject: Re: logarithms on ada
Date: 1997/03/05
Message-ID: <331E0D60.5987@itg-sepg.logicon.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223392316
References: <5fcqrs$ius@panther.Gsu.EDU>
 <01bc28ca$126a6a40$46fd1fcc@p5120.bda> <dewar.857536154@merv>
 <01bc293c$68597140$d96f1fcc@p5120.bda>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Organization: Logicon Information Technology Group
Reply-To: shochat@itg-sepg.logicon.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bob Klungle wrote:
> 
>... There is nothing on the surface or in any documentation that I
> can find that says or implies that ada.numerics.aux in an internal,
> non-standard package. 

Then you must not have the Ada Reference Manual. Elementary functions
are covered in A.5.1. I'd say that if the package is not provided for in
the langauge Standard, then it is non-standard.

It is true that in Ada 83, elementary functions were non-standard, so we
had no choice but to go to vendor-specific packages. But fortunately,
Ada 95 has fixed that.
-- David