From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!seas.gwu.edu!mfeldman
From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Shareware ADA compilers, are there any out there?
Message-ID: <3310@sparko.gwu.edu>
Date: 15 Jun 91 18:04:09 GMT
References: <1991Jun14.223039.13458@rucs2.sunlab.cs.runet.edu> <309@trwacs.UUCP>
Reply-To: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu ()
Organization: The George Washington University, Washington D.C.
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <309@trwacs.UUCP> erwin@trwacs.UUCP (Harry Erwin) writes:
>
>It's unlikely that you'll find a certified shareware Ada compiler. DoD was
                                  ^^^^^^^^^
                                  I think you mean "validated."

>trying to discourage that sort of thing.

In ten years of working with Ada vendors and users, and knowing a number of
the DoD folks, I can say with confidence that I haven't a SHRED of evidence
that DoD "discouraged" anything except the proliferation of NON-VALIDATED
compilers. A shareware distributor who wanted to validate would, I'm sure,
be encouraged to do so. (Have you spoken to them recently?)

Mike