From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: William Ying Subject: Re: C++ Class Date: 1997/02/12 Message-ID: <33021255.2C7A@barra.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 218324418 References: <33018394.1718@scf.usc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: BARRA Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I) Date: 1997-02-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Loc Minh Phan Van wrote: > Is there anyway that we can Define a class that can not be instantiated > in any way by the user (that is, you can not have objects of that type), > but it can be used as a base class. Two solutions: 1) Make the base class as Abstract Base Class (or Absolute Base Class in some books) by setting a virtual function to be zero. It is well documented in any C++ books. 2) Put the base class constructors in protected field. - Bill -