From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: Paul Kenneth Egell-Johnsen Subject: Re: C++ Class Date: 1997/02/12 Message-ID: <3301DF22.7C0D@afrodite.hibu.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 218290754 References: <33018394.1718@scf.usc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Conifer Development - R&D Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.10 9000/720) Date: 1997-02-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Loc Minh Phan Van wrote: > Hi, > Is there anyway that we can Define a class that can not be instantiated > in any way by the user (that is, you can not have objects of that type), > but it can be used as a base class. > > If so please give me a little example. That would be an abstract base class, with pure virtual members. class base { virtual method() = 0; // this is not defined in the base, // derived objects must define this. // Don't think a user can instanciate // this, take a look in the faq. } Paul K Egell-Johnsen mailto:paulken4@afrodite.hibu.no http://afrodite.hibu.no:8001/paulken4/