From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7aeecd1069c28415
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Nick Roberts <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Objects and the Stack?
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:13:29 +0000
Message-ID: <32ej4pF3k243eU1@individual.net>
References: <pan.2004.12.16.17.36.16.856595@nowhere.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net IcBtjULPhymBLKsvAKW5EwMfPZMbGn9jJxJyQL4mM+1gSxYqk=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <pan.2004.12.16.17.36.16.856595@nowhere.net>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7004
Date: 2004-12-16T23:13:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Freejack wrote:

> It's my understanding that one can eliminate the need for pointers (access
> types) through prudent use of tagged types and classes.

I don't think so. What made you think that?

-- 
Nick Roberts