From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: Eric Clayberg Subject: Re: OO, C++, and something much better! Date: 1997/01/25 Message-ID: <32E99B11.1E59@parcplace.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 212067494 references: <32DF458F.4D5C@concentric.net> <32DF94DC.6FF8@watson.ibm.com> <32DFD972.37E4@concentric.net> <5bphq4$5js@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <32E05FAF.47BA@concentric.net> <5buodl$bci@boursy.news.erols.com> <32E2FEC7.2F7B@concentric.net> <5bvncj$gqg$1@A-abe.resnet.ucsb.edu> <32E47B4B.56D9@concentric.net> <5c4fr0$27j@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <32E67751.4AFC@parcplace.com> <32E7253E.4058@iam.unibe.ch> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: ParcPlace-Digitalk, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: clayberg@parcplace.com newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) Date: 1997-01-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robb Nebbe wrote: > Obviously the lack of static typing in Smalltalk does not make it unsuitable > for software development, a fact that some people (probably those who have > never programmed in Smalltalk) seem to have trouble grasping. Yes, that is a common problem. > However, dynamic typing is mostly a stop-gap measure since static type > systems aren't quite up to snuff yet. I expect static type systems to > steadily improve until there is no longer any reasonable justification > for dynamic typing but we aren't there yet in my opinion. I doubt that will ever happen or whether it is even a desirable goal to begin with. I don't see dynamic typing as a stop-gap measure at all. Rather, I see it as a very valuable and valid approach to software development. -Eric