From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: Tom Moran Subject: language marketing question, was Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1997/01/24 Message-ID: <32E958C8.670A@bix.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 212060196 references: <32D11FD3.41C6@wi.leidenuniv.nl> <32E7F7D5.15FB7483@eiffel.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333 mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: tmoran@bix.com newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I) Date: 1997-01-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > But anyone seeing the real situation in the > software world at large could not fail to notice the gigantic amount of > both "hype" (his term in the first paragraph) and "marketing" (his term > in the second) behind C++. Does anyone know of a marketing case study of the initial growth of C and Unix? Both the words and the money behind them?