From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc2ae9f2fffd8bdc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <GarlingtonKE@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Efffect of Language Level of Effort -- Feb 4, 1997 -- TCACMSIGAda
Date: 1997/01/20
Message-ID: <32E3C1AD.1EEE@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 211078611
references: <stachour.853472904@winternet.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; U)
Date: 1997-01-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Paul D. Stachour wrote:
> 
> Tucker Taft, of Intermetrics, has written a paper showing why Ada
> programs can be compiled to more efficient code than C programs.
> The specifics are different, but the reasoning (what is visable to
> the compiler, and how the compiler can take advatage of it) is the
> same as that for the assembler versus systems-implementation languages.

If anyone has a copy of this paper, I'd be interested.

--
LMTAS - The Fighter Enterprise - "Our Brand Means Quality"
For job listings, other info: http://www.lmtas.com or
http://www.lmco.com