From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Re: OO, C++, and something much better! Date: 1997/01/08 Message-ID: <32D3FCB3.7B05@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 208498812 references: <32CCE4ED.6A21@online.no> <5ajo99$khu@panix.com> <32ce7009.280817694@news.zip.com.au> <32D0CA27.44C2@ghgcorp.com> <5aueuv$sm0@uni.library.ucla.edu> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; U) Date: 1997-01-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jay Martin wrote: > > Since the standard was locked, it took 12 years > before any of these problems were corrected. Actually, back with Ada was a MIL-STD, there was a requirement to review it every _five_ years for updates. As I recall, no one wanted to do an update on the first cycle, in order to give implementations a chance to mature. The second cycle ended with Ada 95. What rule (if any) is there for ISO standard review cycles? -- LMTAS - The Fighter Enterprise - "Our Brand Means Quality" For job listings, other info: http://www.lmtas.com or http://www.lmco.com