From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 11cae8,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid11cae8,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
From: Mike Anderson <verx@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ?
Date: 1997/01/02
Message-ID: <32CBC8FC.7079@ix.netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 207277090
references: <5acihm$5uj@news3.digex.net>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Verx
x-netcom-date: Thu Jan 02  8:36:07 AM CST 1997
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: verx@ix.netcom.com
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lnag.java,comp.object,comp.software-eng
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
Date: 1997-01-02T08:36:07-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ell wrote:
> 
> In this thread someone said assembler was "real" and higher level
> languages were abstractions above that.  I always thought voltage
> states/levels were real and that assembler was an abstraction of voltage
> states/levels.
> 
> Elliott

I've never heard this one before.  It's great!
....Mike