From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,978f50245fc02645
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Tom Moran <tmoran@bix.com>
Subject: Re: Root of a GNAT problem (was: Gnat v3.05 bug or compilation
 problem
Date: 1996/12/18
Message-ID: <32B81AA8.7D@bix.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 204788468
references: <dewar.849335191@merv> <58h301$gad@alfali.enst-bretagne.fr>
 <58h6n2$2hbi@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <1996Dec9.110039.1@eisner>
 <dewar.850183545@merv> <32AD89D1.16E0@bix.com>
 <32B7F606.794BDF32@escmail.orl.lmco.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: tmoran@bix.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
Date: 1996-12-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> Of course, once the first email is lost, the second is just as likely as
> any other transmission to be lost (perhaps more).  %-)
  Of course the problem is 'did the first e-mail get lost, or did they
just fail to respond'.