From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,899484222880ae7c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Tom Moran <tmoran@bix.com>
Subject: Re: preventing inheritance
Date: 1996/12/16
Message-ID: <32B64298.3CC5@bix.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 204530311
references: <32B22CDC.3FE4@bix.com> <32B5A234.947@watson.ibm.com>
 <32B640FC.D30@bix.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: tmoran@bix.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
Date: 1996-12-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


The real problem is that U really 'is a' T, it's just that MS does not
give a way to implement a particular operation on objects of type U.
It is not satisfying to simply say 'well, I guess U's aren't T's after
all'.