From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,f41f1f25333fa601
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@escmail.orl.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry
Date: 1996/12/13
Message-ID: <32B19846.446B9B3D@escmail.orl.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 203947054
references: <55ea3g$m1j@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3280DA96.15FB@hso.link.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)
Date: 1996-12-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert I. Eachus wrote:
> 
>     And incidently, one factor that may crop up as a real result of
> this discussion is that there are a couple of "on-the-edge" chips
> where the right government response to a waiver request could be to
> fund a compiler port.  It has happened several times in the past, and
> may happen in the future.

I'm not sure it will happen much in the future if the DoD is cutting
back on their financial support of Ada, as has been suggested.

-- 
T.E.D.          
             |  Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.lmco.com  |
             |  Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net               |
             |  URL  - http://www.iag.net/~dennison          |