From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,da3bc97b715b8d03 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Paul Chardon Subject: Re: new type'class'() legal? Date: 1996/12/10 Message-ID: <32AD0A56.167EB0E7@avions.aerospatiale.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 203281210 references: to: Simon Wright content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m) Date: 1996-12-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hello, I think that the parameter e 's got a value whose type is a subtype from base'class . Since everything that belongs to the class wide type ext'class belongs of course to the class wide type base'class. Consequently, I belive gnat is right. Paul.