From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,338371dbbe7075d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Norman H. Cohen" Subject: Re: [Q] Portability of <= and >= with real operands Date: 1996/12/02 Message-ID: <32A35972.6F41@watson.ibm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 201985195 references: <252531213wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) Date: 1996-12-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Tucker Taft wrote: > This is a bug in AQ&S. Several of the reviewers of AQ&S pointed out > this mistake, but alas, it somehow managed to slip through. One claim > was that this statement was due to Norman Cohen, and hence indisputable. Interesting argument, but I've rarely been able to use it successfully. ;-) > However, Norm (or at least NC1, as we used to call his non-alter-ego ;-) > has since disavowed all connection with this statement. We *ALL* disavow any connection with this statement. -- NC1, NC2, NC3, ... (Norman H. Cohen) mailto:ncohen@watson.ibm.com http://www.research.ibm.com/people/n/ncohen