From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 10461e,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10461e,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: Alan Lovejoy Subject: Re: Interesting but sensitive topic to discuss (HELP: - OOP and CASE tools) Date: 1996/11/12 Message-ID: <32890DB4.7F61@concentric.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 196160715 references: <32813322.41C6@kyebek3.kjist.ac.kr> <55pqr5$136a@grimsel.zurich.ibm.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Modulation mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.ai x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (Win95; U) Date: 1996-11-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert C. Martin wrote: > For example, if object A sends a message to object B, then there must > be a class relationship somewhere that supports that. For example, the > relationships might be an "aggregation" relationship between the class > of A and the class of B. Or it might be an 'association' between > one of the base classes of A and one of the base classes of B, etc. Really? Supose the implementation language has objects, messages and methods, but no classes? For example, a program written in Self. -- Alan L. Lovejoy |==============================================| Smalltalk Consultant | Beware of Geeks bearing GIFs! | alovejoy@concentric.net |==============================================|