From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,35f6cee6f665d64b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr1746819pab.17.1344323768786;
        Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 g9ni3093299pbo.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!ctu-gate!news.nctu.edu.tw!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ada novice <shai.lesh@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANN: Ada 2005 Math Extensions 20120712
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <3288b9b5-d0a4-47ad-9382-4b686c0868a0@googlegroups.com>
References: <m2k3y8ydap.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <167ecede-3588-45f0-904b-06a8be4cfec7@googlegroups.com>
 <m24npay65y.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <2ba72d4e-6e88-4900-8232-c075242dec1f@googlegroups.com>
 <65f76f80-a1e5-4c60-8002-45becc2a1198@googlegroups.com>
 <m2mx2kq5me.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <e1d5d31c-f873-4910-8bf3-6700a17007d1@googlegroups.com>
 <m2ehnvpto3.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.11.21.204
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343674747 11701 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2012 18:59:07
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m2ehnvpto3.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.11.21.204;
 posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-07-30T11:59:06-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, July 28, 2012 8:33:32 PM UTC+1, Simon Wright wrote:
> I'm not a numerical analyst, so I have no idea whether these differences
> 
> represent bugs or features.

>From the lapack documentation:

The computed eigenvectors are normalized to have Euclidean norm equal to 1 and largest component real. 

I have checked for both the "Debian" lapack and the ACML results and they both adhere to the documentation rule.

YC