From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,33e793a459e66944 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Re: Choosing C++ instead of Ada Date: 1996/10/26 Message-ID: <32723CA0.7ED9@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 192327336 references: <01bbb6e2$6385d540$23b2fd86@jssmith.csu891.sandia.gov> <326CF7BC.167E@hso.link.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; 68K) Date: 1996-10-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Stanley R. Allen wrote: > > > One senior executive at a DoD contracting site asked me to name three > > Ada compiler vendors. It was easy to name three, but I realized that > > the field has narrowed. Now name three software companies who provide > > testing tools for Ada. GRC McCabe LDRA and several others.... > What about three providers of configuration management tools? SQL*Systems Tower DEC and several others (particularly since many CM tools are language-insensitive)... > What about other third-party tools? What are you looking for? Requirements analysis tools? Design tools (with Ada code generation)? Documentation tools? GUI builders? Anyone who claims they can't build a complete CASE environment for Ada isn't looking very hard (like, on the AdaIC web pages, or in the STSC reports)... -- LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality" For more info, see http://www.lmtas.com or http://www.lmco.com