From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3112dc3cfb6b9f2 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.135.106 with SMTP id pr10mr14908921pbb.3.1335211578534; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Path: r9ni90386pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Shark8 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Petascale computing Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <32714648.578.1335211577857.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbaf6> References: <15030086.3961.1335171026204.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfk16> NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.2.54.122 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335211578 21059 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2012 20:06:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:06:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <15030086.3961.1335171026204.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfk16> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.2.54.122; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-04-23T13:06:17-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, April 23, 2012 3:50:26 AM UTC-5, gautier...@hotmail.com wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I've received recently a "Call for Proposals" for computational resource-= hungry projects: >=20 > http://hpc.science.doe.gov/allocations/calls/incite2013 >=20 > Perhaps someone here would be interested. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > G. Looks like they're begging for large simulations. One that might be interes= ting is a financial simulation that 1) simulates fractional reserve banking= , as practiced/regulated now, with 2) the national debt/federal reserve pol= ices (monetizing the debt) as 3) the economy continues it's drunken stagger= ing slump. And, if truly ambitious, 4) simulating the effect of bank-runs, = and 5) possible riots. Lots of variables, several differentials there (I'm sure). The whole proces= s would also be interesting if mapped against [fictional] 100% reserve bank= s.