From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3025dd6d917b499c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.183.13 with SMTP id ce13mr13715907qab.4.1349737668524; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.67 with SMTP id t43mr1892528yhg.6.1349737668494; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Path: r17ni19qap.0!nntp.google.com!l8no32021944qao.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:07:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1wzhg6cdjkwjj$.uq66rzr2nlgy.dlg@40tude.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.53.16.250; posting-account=cUi90woAAADTaOISowbbHM8GUD0-opJO NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.53.16.250 References: <38af7fb8-b0a4-4a31-87aa-b7b698cc89c3@googlegroups.com> <3ca0ffd0-1764-484b-8fab-17c0d2dd9463@googlegroups.com> <1f645050-cf4c-40bf-a797-9687b69e4a54@googlegroups.com> <18ats2960nsvm$.kfufsnul13aq$.dlg@40tude.net> <5072c9ae$0$6562$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4keoa6epdxt7.1nnwxy7v7ar90.dlg@40tude.net> <5072dc68$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1f7cmfp1l65w1.1deog8cfxbs0u$.dlg@40tude.net> <5072e37a$0$6556$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1wzhg6cdjkwjj$.uq66rzr2nlgy.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <326d4616-1b24-4d9c-9404-c90c691d9f7a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada, the best language with the not-so-best tool chain From: Patrick Cc: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:07:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-10-08T16:07:48-07:00 List-Id: "From my point of view it looks just useless. We are using modular I/O systems EtherCAT-, XCP-, ModBus-, CAN-/CANOpen-based. " Hi Dmitry I might be misreading this post but it sounds like you are not interested i= n discussing Ada on low level (EDA) embedded. This is a loss for me and the= list. You are very bright and your feedback could help secure another gene= ration of Ada programmers. It seems to me that most of the notable Ada proj= ects are continuations from when Ada was in the spotlight.