From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ccb707f4c91a5f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: lance@eco.twg.com (Lance Kibblewhite) Subject: Re: Portability of Arithmetic (was: Java vs Ada 95) Date: 1996/10/21 Message-ID: <326b87f1.223927761@library.airnews.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 190972306 references: <325D7F9B.2A8B@gte.net> <1996Oct15.174526.1@eisner> <32679C86.2FB8@watson.ibm.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Attachmate Internet Products Group mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: lance@eco.twg.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote: >iNorman says > >"Harrumph! What about 64-bit UNsigned binary arithmetic? 32-bit >arithmetic does not suffice for manipulating offsets into files larger >than 4GB, or for calculating the amount of space available on some >disks, or for timestamps accurate to the nearest millisecond and >spanning a range of 16 months or more." > > >Well if you are telling me that you have written applications that >do all the above, interesting ... I sure have not seen many such uses >in the user code I have seen. > >I am particularly interested in your comments on manipulating offsets >into files larger than 4GB, what operating system are you talking about >here for interest :-) > Windows NT, with NTFS for instance. and Visual C++ does includes the __int64 type for faciliate this. Also Digital Unix. -- Lance.