From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5a05d88755a62a0e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: James Squire <m193884@csehp1.mdc.com>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Transfer of Control
Date: 1996/10/23
Message-ID: <326E38FF.26C5@csehp1.mdc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 191592888
references: <32656457.1A76@csehp1.mdc.com> <dewar.845516800@merv>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: McDonnell Douglas Aerospace
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)
Date: 1996-10-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> iJames asks
> 
> "I reported it to the compiler vendor, and they pointed out to me from the
> AARM (9.8) that I didn't have an abort completion point in my abortable
> part.  I looked at the list of things that qualify, and sure enough I
> don't.
> 
> Unless I am barking up the wrong tree or something, I really don't
> understand this limitation.  Is this yet another example of an invalid
> code sample in the Rationale?"
> 
> The rationale simply assumes you have immediate abort, if not this code
> obviously will not work.

Eh????  What do you mean by immediate abort and what do you mean by 
"having" it?

I'm confused.
-- 
James Squire                             mailto:m193884@csehp1.mdc.com
MDA Avionics Tools & Processes
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace              http://www.mdc.com/
Opinions expressed here are my own and NOT my company's
"Strange. I wonder why he appeared just to you [Londo], Draal and the
    Commander."
'Perhaps because we are most familiar with the third principle of 
sentient
    life."
	-- Delenn and Draal, "A Voice in the Wilderness II"