From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b7857cb3cbabcf8d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 10db24,b7857cb3cbabcf8d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b7857cb3cbabcf8d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: ff6c8,b7857cb3cbabcf8d
X-Google-Attributes: gidff6c8,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b7857cb3cbabcf8d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Ada News Brief
Date: 1996/10/15
Message-ID: <32635742.545C@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 189632117
references: <533utt$43p@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>
 <Dz96K7.Js6@thomsoft.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.sw.components,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.edu
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-10-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Keith Thompson wrote:
> 
> The statement on our Web site (see
> <http://www.thomsoft.com/products/ada/oa/oa2.html>) is:
> 
>     In addition, virtually all Ada 83 code will compile unchanged with
>     ObjectAda.
> 
> As always, I speak only for myself.

By the way, Peter Coffee wrote a glowing review of ObjectAda 7.0 for Windows
in the September 30, 1996 edition of PC Week. He did not include any statement
as to Ada 83 compatibility, however.

-- 
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"
For more info, see http://www.lmtas.com or http://www.lmco.com