From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ccb707f4c91a5f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Brian R. Hanson" <brh@cray.com>
Subject: Re: Java vs Ada 95 (Was Re: Once again,
 Ada absent from DoD SBIR solicitation)
Date: 1996/10/14
Message-ID: <326253D6.15FB@cray.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 189428543
references: <325BC3B3.41C6@hso.link.com>
 <Dz2B9H.9HD.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 	<ROGOFF.96Oct10095045@sccm.Stanford.EDU> <325D7F9B.2A8B@gte.net>
 <JSA.96Oct11152501@alexandria> <dewar.845147148@merv>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Cray Research a division of Silicon Graphics, Inc.
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0SC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.2 IP22)
Date: 1996-10-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> Jon asks
> 
> "Do any Java "the language" implementations exsit which do not target
> the JVM?
> Someone has done a front end for gcc, I don't know how usable it is. But
> more importantly several big companies are producting real Java compilers
> as oppposed to interpretive systems using JVM. Clearly this is an expected
> development. JVM is fine for a limited set of applications, but real
> compilers for Java will greatly increase the possible range of applications.

Does the work someone did for gcc also provide some sort of gc?

-- Brian Hanson
-- brh@cray.com