From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f05f6c2ca4c91ddd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: long term viability of Ada
Date: 1996/10/04
Message-ID: <32555BF2.3CDF@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 187633458
references: <324219D1.15FFEF33@bright.net>
 <01bba6ce$f10dae20$488371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>
 <gwinn-0210961958540001@smc19.ed.ray.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-10-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Joe Gwinn wrote:
> 
> In article <01bba6ce$f10dae20$488371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>, "David C.
> Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote:
> 
> > --
> > Greg A Barnett <barnett@bright.net> wrote in article
> [snip]
> > >
> > As for the DoD's "abandonment" of Ada, you could refer them to the DoD 5000
> > SERIES POLICY DOCUMENTS, found at
> > "http://www.acq.osd.mil/api/asm/dod5000.html".
> > Here is a snippet from that page:
> [big snip]
> 
> Umm.  Greg's question was about the future, not the past.

This is the _new_ DoD policy document, which (according to the people 
that wrote it) represents DoD's position for the immediate future.

> 
> Joe Gwinn

-- 
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"
For more info, see http://www.lmtas.com or http://www.lmco.com