From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cd7d510783cb3f76
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Stanley Allen <sallen@ghgcorp.com>
Subject: Re: Executable File Size Differences
Date: 1996/10/03
Message-ID: <32548F78.5D64@ghgcorp.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 187108519
references: <52bmn5$7r0@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com>
 <52bq9m$7gn@nr1.ottawa.istar.net> <324D6631.4F3F@ghgcorp.com>
 <52o1a8$fre@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <DyLoy8.C0u@thomsoft.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: GHG Internet Services
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
Date: 1996-10-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ken Cowan (Thompson):

> Both Visual C++ and ObjectAda for Windows have a smart linker.   If you
> have a source file containing hundreds of subprograms but only call
> one of them, then only that one gets included into the image.
> 

Hurray!!!!  I'm happy to be corrected in this way.

Now, is anyone going to publish Ada95 compiler comparisons?
Peter Coffee wrote an article for this week's PC Week (Sept. 30)
touting ObjectAda, with *actual performance figures!*

Gentlemen, start your engines...

Stanley Allen
sallen@ghgcorp.com