From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f05f6c2ca4c91ddd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Byron Kauffman <KauffmanBB@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: long term viability of Ada
Date: 1996/09/25
Message-ID: <32492643.50C@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 185243308
references: <324219D1.15FFEF33@bright.net>
 <Dy3Gwq.MI2.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <524sb9$t5g@lex.zippo.com>
 <527bjl$245q@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <3247F19D.552B@lmtas.lmco.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4m)
Date: 1996-09-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Byron Kauffman wrote:
 
> Maybe I'm out of touch, but $100 (for Thomson's ActiveAda) seems pretty
> 'inexpensive' to me...

Of course, I meant ObjectAda...